"The program is easy to use and provides valuable information that combined with the mls data helps inform clients of the total market. I use this tool almost every day."
$10 Billion In Loans Go "Back To The Bene"
Discovery Bay, CA, June 11, 2008 ForeclosureRadar, the only website that tracks every California foreclosure with daily auction updates; today issued its California Foreclosure Report. Lenders, technically called the beneficiary or "bene" by foreclosure auctioneers, took back $10.4 Billion in California loans as a result of foreclosure sales in May. Despite this record we saw a significant increase in investor purchases at auction.
High-level findings include:
Notices of Default, the first step in California's foreclosure process, were down 2.5% for the month totaling 43,011 new filings. Daily average filings were actually up 2.4% to 2,009 filings per day.
Notices of Trustee Sale can be issued 3 months following a Notice of Default and set the date, time and location of the foreclosure auction, increased 15.6 percent in May to a record 34,564 new filings.
Sales at auction increased 11.8% to a total of 25,523 properties. Of those 24,831 received no bid higher than the lenders opening bid and became lender owned (REO). The combined loan value at the time of foreclosure on this new REO inventory exceeded $10 Billion for the first time.
Despite more than 97% of foreclosed properties being returned to the lender, there was a notable 34.6% increase in properties purchased by third parties. We believe this third party bidding is due to a renewed investor interest as the lenders continue to increase discounts at auction.
"The increase in investor purchases at foreclosure auction is a welcome change." said Sean O'Toole, founder of ForeclosureRadar. "For too long lenders were unrealistic about opening bids at auction. They finally seem to realize the magnitude of the problem and are beginning to discount accordingly."
Lenders discounted 86 percent of all foreclosures taken to sale with an average discount of 28 percent. The Northern California Counties of Sacramento, San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Merced saw the largest average opening bid discounts ranging from 31 to 37 percent. In Southern California, Riverside saw the largest discounts, with an average of 27.5 percent, followed by San Bernardino at 25 percent.
At the county level we saw noticeable increases in foreclosure sales in both Riverside, which saw the highest level of foreclosures per capita in May, and San Bernardino which saw foreclosure sales increase by 22%. By total loan value, Southern California counties filled out the top five with Los Angeles having $1.83 Billion in loans foreclosed, Riverside $1.43B, San Bernardino $900M, San Diego $883M, and Orange at $695M. This is primarily due to the size of these counties - for example Los Angeles always has the highest foreclosure counts, yet ranks 33rd in our report when normalized for population.
| ForeclosureRadar May Report by County | ||||||||
| Rank | Change In Rank | County | NDF | NTS | Sales | Population Per Sale |
% Change April 2008 |
% Change May 2007 |
| 1 | 2 | Riverside | 5385 | 4447 | 3564 | 548 | 9% | 269% |
| 2 | -1 | Merced | 564 | 509 | 431 | 573 | -2% | 307% |
| 3 | -1 | San Joaquin | 1498 | 1426 | 1102 | 605 | -5% | 232% |
| 4 | 1 | Stanislaus | 1271 | 1080 | 817 | 630 | 4% | 304% |
| 5 | 4 | San Bernardino | 4106 | 3359 | 2648 | 752 | 22% | 322% |
| 6 | 7 | San Benito | 49 | 54 | 76 | 758 | 41% | 375% |
| 7 | -1 | Sacramento | 2620 | 2237 | 1730 | 801 | 5% | 169% |
| 8 | 0 | Yuba | 143 | 90 | 86 | 812 | 6% | 146% |
| 9 | 6 | Madera | 206 | 148 | 170 | 849 | 34% | 448% |
| 10 | -3 | Solano | 826 | 612 | 481 | 879 | -2% | 285% |
| 11 | 3 | Contra Costa | 1723 | 1356 | 1141 | 902 | 20% | 310% |
| 12 | -1 | Kern | 1266 | 1037 | 795 | 981 | 2% | 235% |
| 13 | 5 | Sutter | 141 | 99 | 76 | 1,203 | 21% | 204% |
| 14 | 5 | Placer | 432 | 370 | 248 | 1,276 | 18% | 188% |
| 15 | 2 | Monterey | 613 | 449 | 307 | 1,384 | 2% | 339% |
| 16 | 12 | Sonoma | 488 | 428 | 328 | 1,463 | 39% | 438% |
| 17 | 6 | San Diego | 3362 | 2801 | 1977 | 1,551 | 17% | 191% |
| 18 | 7 | Fresno | 957 | 738 | 561 | 1,603 | 21% | 257% |
| 19 | -9 | Lake | ND | ND | 40 | 1,603 | -39% | 186% |
| 20 | -8 | Calaveras | ND | ND | 26 | 1,758 | -40% | 2500% |
| 21 | 1 | Tehama | ND | ND | 33 | 1,865 | -6% | 106% |
| 22 | 4 | Ventura | 784 | 635 | 437 | 1,870 | 5% | 267% |
| 23 | 6 | Amador | 28 | 29 | 20 | 1,907 | 11% | 82% |
| 24 | 3 | El Dorado | 185 | 141 | 91 | 1,936 | 3% | 107% |
| 25 | -4 | Yolo | 200 | 136 | 97 | 1,962 | -9% | 116% |
| 26 | 6 | Alameda | 1457 | 1080 | 754 | 1,991 | 15% | 259% |
| 27 | -7 | Imperial | 229 | 193 | 83 | 2,007 | -22% | 137% |
| 28 | 7 | Napa | 116 | 85 | 65 | 2,068 | 41% | 282% |
| 29 | -13 | Colusa | ND | ND | 10 | 2,151 | -44% | 900% |
| 30 | -6 | Tulare | 415 | 275 | 193 | 2,179 | -14% | 245% |
| 31 | -1 | Santa Barbara | 311 | 256 | 188 | 2,243 | 9% | 300% |
| 32 | 1 | Orange | 2528 | 2046 | 1332 | 2,307 | 18% | 302% |
| 33 | 1 | Los Angeles | 8209 | 6416 | 4274 | 2,397 | 15% | 283% |
| 34 | 6 | Santa Clara | 1291 | 920 | 674 | 2,631 | 35% | 536% |
| 35 | 3 | Shasta | 107 | 101 | 65 | 2,792 | 14% | 81% |
| 36 | 6 | Butte | 95 | 54 | 75 | 2,896 | 29% | 108% |
| 37 | 2 | Santa Cruz | 183 | 127 | 85 | 3,086 | 5% | 673% |
| 38 | 5 | Kings | 93 | 53 | 46 | 3,212 | 18% | 360% |
| 39 | -3 | Nevada | 85 | 58 | 30 | 3,336 | -9% | 100% |
| 40 | -3 | San Luis Obispo | 190 | 118 | 74 | 3,557 | -14% | 196% |
| 41 | 4 | Tuolumne | 45 | 22 | 16 | 3,639 | 23% | 433% |
| 42 | 9 | Mendocino | 36 | 28 | 18 | 5,025 | 29% | 260% |
| 43 | 6 | Marin | 98 | 80 | 50 | 5,067 | 6% | 400% |
| 44 | -13 | Mariposa | ND | ND | 3 | 6,072 | -57% | ND |
| 45 | 5 | San Mateo | 417 | 318 | 119 | 6,085 | 1% | 240% |
| 46 | -2 | Siskiyou | 18 | 18 | 7 | 6,592 | -36% | 75% |
| 47 | 5 | Trinity | ND | ND | 2 | 7,012 | -33% | 100% |
| 48 | 7 | Del Norte | ND | ND | 3 | 9,732 | 50% | 200% |
| 49 | -2 | Modoc | ND | ND | 1 | 9,836 | -50% | ND |
| 50 | -9 | Plumas | 12 | 4 | 2 | 10,722 | -67% | 100% |
| 51 | -5 | Mono | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13,597 | -86% | -50% |
| 52 | 2 | San Francisco | 171 | 110 | 54 | 14,790 | -14% | 200% |
| 53 | 0 | Humboldt | 39 | 20 | 8 | 16,566 | -27% | 33% |
| 54 | -6 | Lassen | ND | ND | 2 | 17,726 | -75% | -50% |
Sign up to receive the California Foreclosure Report
CALIFORNIA FORECLOSURE REPORT METHODOLOGY
Rankings are based on population per foreclosure sale. NDF indicates the number of Notices of Default that were filed at the county, and NTS indicates filed Notices of Trustee Sale. Sales indicates the number of properties sold at foreclosure auction. Percentage changes are based on monthly Sales. The data presented by ForeclosureRadar is based on county records and individual sales results from daily foreclosure auctions throughout the state—not estimates or projections.
Comments
Post new comment