Foreclosure Sales Drop Substantially

Loan modification activity forestalls impact of negative equity
Foreclosure sales dropped by 39.1 percent from the prior month, due to significant increases in cancellations and postponements. Under California law, scheduled foreclosure sales can be postponed for a period of up to one year, until they are either cancelled or sold. Cancellations, where the home is taken out of foreclosure, increased by 78 percent in October, resulting in nearly 20 percent of foreclosure sales scheduled for October being called off.

Discovery Bay, CA, November 12, 2008 ForeclosureRadar, the only website that tracks every California foreclosure with daily auction updates; today issued its California Foreclosure Report for October 2008. Foreclosure sales dropped by 39.1 percent from the prior month, due to significant increases in cancellations and postponements. Under California law, scheduled foreclosure sales can be postponed for a period of up to one year, until they are either cancelled or sold. Cancellations, where the home is taken out of foreclosure, increased by 78 percent in October, resulting in nearly 20 percent of foreclosure sales scheduled for October being called off.

Notice of Default filings, which start the foreclosure process, continue to be significantly impacted by CA State Senate Bill 1137, as lenders work through the new requirements the law imposed. Notices of Trustee Sale, however, rebounded after a significant drop the prior month.

High-level findings include:

  • Notice of Default filings increased slightly in October, up 2.8 percent from September, to a total of 16,810 filings. Year over year, Notice of Default filings are down 42.3 percent.

  • Notices of Trustee Sale, which schedule the auction date and time, increased by 32.9 percent in October, to 25,408 filings. Despite the significant increase, this level of filings remains well below average levels earlier this year, as September levels were clearly impacted by CA State Senate Bill 1137.

  • Properties taken to sale at auction declined by 39.1 percent from September, to 14,042 sales, with a combined loan balance of $6.39 Billion. This represents a 28.8 percent increase from the prior year.

  • Lenders took back 94 percent of the properties taken to auction, with a combined loan value of $9.19 Billion. Third party purchases declined 24 percent from the prior month, but increased 25 percent (as a percentage of all foreclosure sales), due to the decline in sales activity.

"It is important to note that the significant decline in October foreclosure sales cannot be directly attributed to CA State Senate Bill 1137," said Sean O'Toole, founder of ForeclosureRadar. "There were nearly 60,000 properties scheduled for sale at the beginning of October over which the law had no affect. The drop in foreclosure sales, therefore, can only be reasonably attributed to changes introduced by the lenders themselves and not in response to SB 1137."

The increase in cancellations was led primarily by Countrywide which saw a 460 percent increase in cancellations from the prior month, and a 48 percent decline in the number of properties they sold at auction. Other lenders had similar drops in foreclosure sales, though more often due to postponement, rather than cancellation as in Countrywide's case. Statewide, the percentage of foreclosure sales that had postponed at least once, increased from 36 percent of sales to 58 percent of sales, with the average length of postponement increasing from 24 days to 42 days.

"It would be a mistake to conclude that the declines in foreclosure activity indicate that the foreclosure crisis is over," continued O'Toole. "While lenders now appear to be embracing the concept of foreclosure moratoriums and loan modifications, neither typically address the core issue of negative equity. Most loan modifications focus on lowering payments to affordable levels by using unsustainably low interest rates, not unlike the 'teaser rates' that many have blamed for the current crisis."

Average discounts offered by lenders on the outstanding loan balance at foreclosure auction declined slightly from prior months, and averaged 36.1 percent statewide, with 33 percent of properties taken to auction being offered at discounts of 50 percent or more.

At the county level there was little significant change in rankings between counties, and almost all had drops in foreclosure sales activity that roughly reflected the statewide declines.

October 08 Foreclosure Report

ForeclosureRadar October Report by County
Rank Change
In
Rank
County NDF NTS Sales Population
Per Sale
% Change
Sept. 2008
% Change
Oct. 2007
1 0 Merced 190 376 288 857 -32% 58%
2 1 Riverside 2037 3099 1743 1,121 -42% 6%
3 7 Yuba 60 81 62 1,126 -14% 22%
4 0 Stanislaus 404 796 447 1,151 -41% 10%
5 -3 San Joaquin 543 1066 559 1,192 -46% -14%
6 3 San Benito 10 19 46 1,253 -29% 77%
7 0 San Bernardino 1752 2427 1450 1,374 -36% 25%
8 0 Madera 87 186 98 1,473 -39% 44%
9 -4 Solano 329 572 281 1,505 -43% 12%
10 -4 Sacramento 892 1585 881 1,573 -44% -15%
11 0 Contra Costa 652 1083 649 1,586 -36% 18%
12 5 Imperial 93 153 94 1,772 -27% 54%
13 -1 Kern 565 763 413 1,888 -45% -5%
14 0 Monterey 199 409 221 1,922 -40% 64%
15 18 Mariposa 2 6 9 2,024 13% 800%
16 -3 Calaveras 1 0 21 2,177 -49% 250%
17 2 Placer 233 240 142 2,229 -35% -11%
18 13 El Dorado 91 104 69 2,554 -17% 0%
19 13 Tuolumne 31 34 22 2,647 -15% 214%
20 -5 Lake 19 25 24 2,671 -54% -14%
21 -1 Fresno 438 608 329 2,734 -42% 8%
22 -6 Sutter 39 89 33 2,771 -54% -20%
23 3 San Diego 1217 1863 1080 2,840 -33% 28%
24 6 Amador 23 14 13 2,933 -32% 44%
25 -2 Sonoma 178 290 161 2,981 -41% 49%
26 -2 Napa 36 98 43 3,127 -43% 30%
27 -2 Alameda 541 947 478 3,141 -40% 9%
28 -1 Tulare 177 235 133 3,163 -39% 46%
29 12 Nevada 41 49 30 3,336 -9% 36%
30 -8 Sierra 1 0 1 3,501 -50% 200%
31 -2 Ventura 258 418 231 3,538 -44% 4%
32 -14 Colusa 1 0 6 3,585 -67% 500%
33 -12 Yolo 71 124 51 3,732 -54% -22%
34 12 Shasta 87 80 43 4,221 -12% 30%
35 1 Los Angeles 3557 4839 2413 4,246 -36% 24%
36 -8 Plumas 3 2 5 4,289 -55% 150%
37 12 Tehama 1 0 14 4,395 -59% -22%
38 4 San Luis Obispo 85 101 57 4,618 -34% 16%
39 0 Orange 947 1384 662 4,641 -37% 18%
40 -5 Santa Barbara 93 165 89 4,737 -48% -12%
41 2 Santa Cruz 61 102 55 4,770 -35% 41%
42 6 Glenn 2 2 6 4,775 -40% 20%
43 -6 Santa Clara 499 811 364 4,872 -44% 54%
44 1 Siskiyou 12 9 9 5,127 -31% 200%
45 -5 Butte 33 33 36 6,034 -63% -8%
46 -8 Kings 52 48 20 7,386 -62% -13%
47 3 San Mateo 136 163 88 8,228 -47% 22%
48 5 Marin 51 59 27 9,383 -40% 69%
49 -5 Modoc 4 1 1 9,836 -67% -75%
50 2 Mendocino 24 18 8 11,306 -53% 100%
51 -4 Lassen 1 0 3 11,817 -70% -75%
52 2 Humboldt 17 23 8 16,566 -64% -20%
53 4 San Francisco 70 95 27 29,581 -47% -41%

Sign up to receive the California Foreclosure Report

CALIFORNIA FORECLOSURE REPORT METHODOLOGY
Rankings are based on population per foreclosure sale. NDF indicates the number of Notices of Default that were filed at the county, and NTS indicates filed Notices of Trustee Sale. Sales indicates the number of properties sold at foreclosure auction. Percentage changes are based on monthly Sales. The data presented by ForeclosureRadar is based on county records and individual sales results from daily foreclosure auctions throughout the state—not estimates or projections.

Comments

I now firmly believe that Paulson's announcement of troubled asset relief was directly responsible for this drop in sales activity. If you look back to that announcement there is a lot of talk about the assets being temporarily impaired and that banks shouldn't be forced to sell the assets, or even mark them to market. With balance sheets in trouble better to leave non-paying loans on the balance sheet with minimal loss reserves and wait, then to foreclose, take the loss, and put solvency in question.

Good article. Rapidshare Search Engine site, it's a site where you can download almost all the files that you were looking for.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.