With regard to Ca Civil Code 1695: Is there someone ...
Submitted by carolynduanelacy
from CA
- 07/04/2009 - 12:34pm
With regard to Ca Civil Code 1695: Is there someone I can talk with regarding some of the details in this legislation?
Before You Post
All comments should be relevant to the topic of the post and are subject to the terms found in our User Agreement.
Comments
Look for a good real estate attorney. If you are a Realtor, the California Association of Realtors has a legal team that has written quite a bit on it, and I believe they are also take member questions. If you have a specific question regarding the law we'd also be happy to share our thoughts.
I am not a Realtor and, therefore, do not have access to CAR's legal team. I am an investor interested in negotiating the SS with the lender and then selling the property to an end buyer in a double closing. I have talked with 4 local RE attorneys who have advised me against doing these transactions because of the roadblcoks imposed by CCC 1695.
Can you recommend an experienced RE Attorney who can help me with the paperwork for the SS transaction in a way that satisfies the requriements of CCC 1695? I am in the SF Bay Area.
My attorney advised the same re:1695. And with just a couple of exceptions, I've listened to him.
That said there are a lot of folks out there who buy preforeclosures and who do (or have done) quite well. I've met a number and some are fabulous people, and others are down right crooks. I don't think at the end of the day they simply found a better attorney. Instead I think the reality is that most folks who are losing their home will never have sufficient funds to mount a legal fight against you. District Attorneys sometimes get involved, but usually only if it involves the elderly as they are too underfunded to take on the investigative work necessary to pursue these cases.
And in the case of a short sale the likelihood of the homeowner coming after you is perhaps fairly low in which case you might not really need to worry about 1695.
Instead I'd be worried about the lender. I certainly would not make any statements the lender could find to be fraudulent. A lot of these loans are federally insured, and if you submit a false appraisal or make other false claims you could find yourself facing federal fraud charges.
Good luck.
Hi Sean,
There are specific forms that need to be used when purchasing homes in default and CCC's are clear when it comes to investors. "Double closings" are a whole other thing and most title companies won't do them. Sellers have recourse up to 2 years + all legal fees so you got some good advise from the attorneys.
I'm aware of one attorney in Sacramento that invests in these properties and he may be able to help you
.
Hey Sean, I'm in the L.A. area and I was wondering if you might know of any good foreclosure attorneys out this way... Thanks.
I have read and heard of Ron Ballard, a California attorney, who has extensive experience and perhaps is an authority on Short Sale legislation. As a matter of fact I have attended several Webinars that Ron has participated in. Readers may want to check the State Bar Association of the location of this attorney.
As long as you do a 50/50 equity split with the homeowner and give them a 5 day cooling off period before they accept your offer you will stay out of trouble.check your local established REI club for competant foreclosure trainers which actually invest in foreclosures for valid training before you do any equity buy out transaction.Hope this helps,,
It is my understading that The Seller or home owner cannot receive any money
Nothing in the ca civil code says that. What you heard is probably a lender requirement when the lender agrees to a short sale.
Hello,
I am a newbie investor and just bought a short sale. I have never purchsed a short sale before and actually did not expect to close this property. Here is the situation.
The realtor had a short sale listing that he listed in September 2009 and sold in 1 day at 270K ($270K is a good price at that time. Market has been increasing since that time). Being a short sale escrow went on forever and that original buyer eventually gave up in late January 2010. The agent contaced me and asked if I would be interested in this property in early February 2010 at the $270K price and I said yes (thinking being a short sale it would still take a while and the chances of getting this property at $270K may be slim anyways). Well lo and behold the short sale was approved in about a weeks time and we were able to close in 2 weeks (I got the property for $270K and the appraisal came in at $310K). Apparently the entire time the property was in escrow with the first buyer the short sale wheels were turning and I got the approval at the end of the process. After close of escrow my agent learns of ccc 1695 and informs me of future liability.
What I want to know is what am I to do now? We have the property for sale at $359K and it should sell for $350K. We have clean the carpet, paint touch up, new sod, drained and cleaned the pool, cleaned up the landscape (house was a mess, lots of kids and wild dogs). I am now worried that the prior owner will come back for damages. What is my liability, my agents liability and what should I do now. I am upset with this agent for pulling me into this (even though he did not know about ccc 1695 he should have known). I did not do anything to pressure the seller into selling and the price was actually set the the original purchaser in September 2009 when the market was lower.
Any insight greatly appreciated!!
I believe you would be an "equity purchaser" under CC 1695. I'm guessing your agent failed to use the correct form, or provide the 5 day cancellation period as required by that law.
You can read the possible consequences of those actions here: http://www.foreclosureradar.com/ca-foreclosure-law/ca-foreclosure-law-ci.... Specifically read 1695.7, 1695.8.
Using a representative may have created additional liability for you. See section 1695.17.
I've heard many preforeclosure investors say they don't worry about CC1695 because homeowners aren't aware of it, and they've bought hundreds of properties without problem.
For now the first thing I'd do is a get a preliminary title report and see if the title company will insure the sale (note that CC1695 allows the sale to be rescinded for up to 2 years if you didn't take the required actions, so there is real risk for a title co). If they won't insure it, you might try making a deal with the seller to clear up the title issue.
Maybe some of the preforeclosure investors that deal with this all the time have more to add...
I am an active SS investor. There are ways to work with 1695. I would not recommend Ron Ballard. He has only been work with SS's for two years and was new to them then. Most of his material was taken from another attorney and did not work in California.
I am an active SS investor. There are ways to work with 1695. I would not recommend Ron Ballard. He has only been work with SS's for two years and was new to them then. Most of his material was taken from another attorney and did not work in California.
Post new comment